Construction Relief Package Meaning-less Unless Extended to Real Estate

The tax experts said that the housing sector will not be able to reap the true benefits of a relief package for the construction sector, as the amnesty of non-disclosure of investment has not been extended to the real estate as a whole. The independent sources are of the opinion that the role of ABAD is also significant in the design of these relief incentives which actually are not aimed at to provide relief to the daily wagers but to the vested interest who are always in search of such opportunities in the wake of some ensuing crises.

Muhammad Javed, a tax consultant, said the package has focused only the constructed properties while the investment in plots or trading activities of the sector would still remain dormant as heavy Capital Value Tax and Capital Gains Tax would still create a stumbling block in a full circle turnaround of the construction sector.

Also Read: ‘Punjab to Have 70 New Sports Projects’

He also was of the view that FBR should play it part in decreasing heavy taxes in the shape of Sales Tax and FED on construction material such as cement and steel. He said another area of heavy taxation belongs to imports of construction material and machinery. This needs to be either slashed or reduced significantly.

Shahid Pervaiz Jami, a leading tax lawyer, said the federal government should think of a total overhaul of the taxation policies instead of granting relief to isolated sectors to turnaround the economy as a whole.

Raza Ahmed, a tax expert, said the FBR has reduced no tax on any input relating to the construction sector. There is an urgent need for reduction in the cost of the construction material by providing relief to the industries allied to the construction material.

He also posed a question that how 25 allied industries can be operationalized if their tax liabilities are not reduced by the government to bring the prices of construction material down. No construction activity can take place unless the government makes the construction material cheaper, he stressed.

He further pointed out that the facility of non-disclosure of financial resources is limited to the purchase of only one house. It would lead to the tax evasion practices, as the buyers would show further buying in the names of their close relatives to avail the opportunity. Instead, he proposed that there should be a general extension of the facility that no source would be inquired about if one invests in the construction sector.

Source